What is a section 57 natural justice letter?

It is a letter the Department must send before refusing a visa on the basis of 'relevant information' — information that would be the reason (or part of the reason) for refusal, is specifically about you, and was not supplied by you. The letter gives you the particulars, explains why the information matters, and invites you to comment before a decision is made.

What is the difference between a section 56 and a section 57 letter?

A section 56 letter invites you to provide additional information the Department needs to finish assessing your application — it is often not adverse. A section 57 letter puts specific adverse information to you and invites you to comment before it is used to refuse you. Both carry firm deadlines, but section 57 is the codified natural justice obligation.

What happens if I miss the deadline to respond?

The deadline in a natural justice letter is set by regulation and is generally strict. If you do not respond in time and in the manner specified, the decision-maker can proceed to decide on the information already held — which usually means a refusal. Do not assume the Department will follow up or extend time. Act the moment you receive the letter.

Can a natural justice letter be about a discrepancy in my Form 80?

Yes. Inconsistencies between your visa application and your Form 80, or between forms and other records, are a common trigger. If the issue is a genuine mistake, the correct step is often to correct the record properly using Form 1023 (notification of incorrect answers), supported by evidence, rather than simply explaining it away.

What if the Department refuses my visa without giving me a chance to respond?

Where a section 57 obligation was owed and the Department did not comply, the refusal may be affected by jurisdictional error. That can be a ground for review at the Administrative Review Tribunal or for judicial review in the Federal Circuit and Family Court. It has to be identified and argued — it will not be corrected automatically — so have the decision assessed quickly.

Should I get legal advice before responding to a natural justice letter?

It is strongly advisable, particularly where the concern involves documents, false or misleading information, character, or a relationship. How you frame the response, what evidence you attach, and whether you correct the record can determine the outcome — and a poorly judged response can make things worse. Because the deadlines are short, seek advice as soon as the letter arrives.

Natural Justice Letters (s 56 & s 57): How to Respond

A letter from the Department of Home Affairs inviting you to comment is one of the most important documents you will ever receive in a visa application. Handled well, it can save an application. Ignored or mishandled, it is very often the last step before a refusal.

These are commonly called natural justice letters, or procedural fairness letters. In the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) they sit mainly in sections 56 and 57. Knowing which one you have — and what it actually requires — changes how you should respond.

What is a natural justice letter?

Natural justice (procedural fairness) is the principle that you should know the case against you and have a fair chance to answer it before an adverse decision is made.

For visa applications, that principle is largely codified. The Department cannot simply refuse you on the basis of adverse information you have never seen. In defined circumstances it must put that information to you first and give you an opportunity to respond.

When that opportunity arrives, it usually comes as a letter with a firm deadline. The deadline is the part people underestimate.

Section 57 — the invitation to comment on adverse information

Section 57 is the key natural justice provision at the application stage. It applies to what the Act calls "relevant information" — information that:

would be the reason, or part of the reason, for refusing the visa; and
is specifically about you (or another person), not just about a class of persons; and
was not given by you for the purpose of the application.

Where the decision-maker holds relevant information of that kind, section 57 requires them to give you the particulars, explain why it is relevant, and invite you to comment. There are exceptions — for example, "non-disclosable information" and information you supplied yourself do not trigger the obligation.

If a section 57 obligation applies and the Department fails to comply, that can be a jurisdictional error — a ground for challenging the decision at the tribunal or in the courts.

Section 56 — a request for more information

Section 56 is different in character. It empowers the decision-maker to invite you to give additional information in support of your application. It is not necessarily about adverse material — often it is a request for documents the Department needs to finish assessing your case.

A section 56 letter is an opportunity. It usually means a decision has not been made and the Department wants more before it decides. Treat it as your chance to complete the picture, not as a formality.

All immigration guides