• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
MyVisa Site Logo

MyVisa® Immigration Lawyers

Immigration Law Advisory

  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Pricing
  • Locations
  • Contact

Immigration Guides

Guide to Advertising When Sponsoring a Foreign Worker [Updated 2022]

Nilesh Nandan · May 19, 2022

Home » Immigration Guides

Advertising when Sponsoring

Labour Market Testing

Unless an International Trade Obligation (ITO) applies, you must provide evidence that you have tested the labour market by attempting to recruit a suitably qualified and experienced Australian worker for the nominated position. This is called the Labour Market Testing (‘LMT’) requirement.

4 Week Rule

To satisfy the LMT requirement, when the position nomination is lodged, you will need to provide evidence that you have advertised the position within the last 4 months, for a total period of at least four (4) weeks.

The applications or expressions of interest for the advertised position will need to be accepted for the duration of four (4) weeks. The advertising does not need to be in consecutive weeks.

The advertising must meet the following criteria:

  • the nominated position must be advertised in Australia on a recruitment website with a national reach in Australia;
  • on the Australian Government’s Jobactive website: https://jobactive.gov.au/ and
  • at least TWO advertisements (paid or unpaid) were published: on a prominent or professional recruitment website with national reach, that publishes advertisements for positions throughout Australia.

If the approved sponsor is an accredited sponsor, the nominated position can be advertised on the approved sponsor’s website.

Not Social Media!

Advertising may be accepted via an industry-specific recruitment website.

If they are relevant to the nominated occupation and are known to be used by the industry.

However, classified websites and advertisements that only use social media notifications (e.g. Twitter or Instagram) are not accepted.

LinkedIn’s online recruitment platform is acceptable, job vacancies restricted to LinkedIn profile members only are NOT acceptable.

The Language of the Ad

The language used for the advertisement for the nominated position will need to be in English.

Details of the Position

Each advertisement intended for a nominated position must include the following details in the position:

  • title of position or a description of the position
  • skills and/or experience required for the position
  • the salary for the position, if the intended annual earning for the nominated position is lower than $96,000
  • the name of the sponsor, or if the sponsor has engaged a recruitment agency for the purposes of LMT, the name of the recruitment agency

Don’t Wing It

Evidence of the advertisement process will need to be supplied to the Department to demonstrate that your advertising meets these criteria.

Summary Statement

Following the end of the process, a brief statement of the results of the recruitment process will need to be provided to the Department.

This will include how many candidates (if any) you interviewed, and why they were deemed unsuitable. If LMT evidence is not submitted at the time of the position nomination application lodgement, the application can be refused.

Time Period

For a nominated occupation, the time period that the LMT is required to be undertaken is 4 months, ending on the day on which the nomination form for the nominated application is lodged.

DO YOU need help with your business sponsorship?
BOOK CONSULT

Ask Me A Question!

Please share your questions and comments with me below. This forum helps others find answers to more real-life immigration questions.

I’d love to know more about your experiences. What would you like to share with me?

Section 57: A Guide To Natural Justice Letters [Update 2022]

Nilesh Nandan · May 17, 2022

Home » Immigration Guides

Get Natural Justice Letter Help Here.

Have you received a Natural Justice Letter?

The people at immigration are not so bad.  Usually, you will receive the letter under section 57 of the Migration Act when a case officer has formed a view that your visa application ought to be refused.

The department it’s been kind. the purpose of the section 57 letter also known as a natural justice letter is to give you an opportunity to recover from a likely refusal position.

It could be that the decision-maker has missed something fundamental all that something critical to the application is simply not appearing on the departmental file.

It could also be that are very basic requirements of criteria that need to be satisfied either at the time of application or the time of the decision, appears to the case officer not to be satisfied. 

s57-Natural-Justice-Letter-Example.jpg

This letter is an opportunity for the case officer to be fair with you. Yes, they can be nice! What you need to do is to ensure that your application does have merits given the concern or multiple concerns raised by the departmental officer in their letter.

If your application does not have merit then you might be better off withdrawing your application. 

Whether you should respond to the letter or you should simply withdraw the application it’s something that requires careful consideration.

One thing that I see you all the time is people providing far more information that is required in relation to the letter. 

In providing the wrong information or too much information or information responses that are not properly worded, or which did not address the point being raised will certainly prejudice your already weak position.

To discuss how best to respond to a Natural Justice letter, please book a consultation with me.

Your Experience?

Please share your comments with me.

I’d love to know more about your experience with applying for this visa subclass!

Australian Bridging Visas: A Guide to Understanding Differences Between Different Bridging Visas & BV Conditions [Update 2022]

Nilesh Nandan · May 9, 2022

Home » Immigration Guides

Bridging Visa Australia

This temporary visa allows you to stay in Australia after your “current” substantive visa ceases and while your “new substantive” visa application is being processed.

It “bridges” your stay in Australia from the cease date of your current visa usually until 35 days after a final decision is made on your application.

How to apply for a bridging visa?

Most of the time you don’t need to make a formal application for a bridging visa. This is because it is granted to you by operation of law. 

Is the application necessary?

A formal bridging visa application is usually not needed if you apply for a further visa while you are in Australia and you already hold a substantive visa at the time of making your further visa application.

Automatic grant

The reason why a formal visa application for a bridging visa might not be required is that by operation of law, the valid application for a further visa in Australia is typically (but not always) deemed to be an application for a bridging visa as well. That application is usually always granted, either manually or automatically.

Purpose

The purpose of a bridging visa is to bridge the gap, if any, between the time at which your current substantive visa expires and the point in time when your new substantive visa is granted.

The bridging visa is a mechanism for keeping you lawfully present in Australia.

Otherwise…

If a bridging visa was not to be granted, then it would mean that you would be an unlawful non-citizen, present in Australia for that period between when your substantive visa expires and your further visa is decided.

Types of bridging visas

The three most common types of bridging visas are a, b, and e.

Which do you have?

The most important thing to check is that you always have a visa whilst you are in Australia (if you’re not the holder of an Australian passport).

You can check the visa that you hold at any time by completing a VEVO check. It’s online and free.

Know this…

Bridging visa checklist Nilesh Nandan Immigration Lawyer

BVB limitation

Be careful with a bridging visa b (BVB). Its purpose is to allow you to leave and return to Australia whilst you are waiting on a further substantive visa to be granted to you; you may exit Australia for a very finite travel period and must re-enter Australia by a specified date.

BVB disaster

The biggest risk with a BVB is that you forget the period for which your BVB is granted, and you then fail to re-enter Australia before the date specified. Take very careful note to start returning to Australia several days before your BVB expires, so that you have ample time to re-enter Australia when you return.

Bridging visa after re-entry

When you re-enter Australia your bridging visa b does not change back to a BVA but will show as a BVB, allowing you to continue to stay in Australia but importantly does not then have any exit and return facility.

Second BVB

You will need to take care to lodge a further BVB if you wish to again exit Australia during the period in which you are waiting for the grant of your further substantive visa.

If you hold a BVA or a BVB you can apply for a further BVB.

Only one chance!

Unfortunately, if you hold a BVC or a BVD or a BVE then you can’t apply for a BVB. It’s like losing your virginity.

Think of it this way – if you hold a BVC or BVD or BVE, you can never go back to get a BVB, at least until after your further substantive visa application has been granted.

As explained above, bridging visas “bridge” you from the time an existing visa ceases to be “in effect” until the time a decision is made on any new visa you may have applied for.

Bridging visa lifespan after a decision on substantive application

Usually, the bridging visa will run for a period of up to 28 days (and possibly 35 days, depending on when you lodge your application and when your bridging visa is granted) after the decision of the Department to refuse your visa application, allowing you or your migration agent or immigration lawyer enough time to file an appeal.

Bridging visa lawyer Nilesh Nandan

Bridging visa to travel overseas

The Department of Home Affairs can issue you with a bridging visa if you intend to exit Australia. This is known as “bridging visa on departure grounds”. These visas are for a fixed period.

Extension of BVE

There may be some scope to have these extended if, for some reason, you can’t depart. This is subject to negotiation between you and the compliance officer at the Department of Home Affairs.

For example, you might be without a visa and need a week or so to get things in order before you can exit Australia.

Immigration will often grant you this type of visa for a fixed term which will allow you time to exit the country or lodge another application.

Depart on BVE – consequences

There are serious consequences that follow after you exit Australia on a BVE. This is known as “special return criteria” where you may suffer a period of exclusion from Australia or ban from having a further visa granted for Australia.

BVE ban duration

The duration of this ban will depend on the sort of visa you are applying for and your circumstances for something that I advise on regularly and you should get independent immigration legal advice if you wish to make an application for Australia after exiting on a BVE.

Bridging visa “in effect”

Although your bridging visa may be granted (and you may have received a letter from Immigration saying that you have been granted this visa) take care to note that this visa will usually only come “into effect” when your existing visa expires and will remain in place while your new visa application is being considered. For example, suppose you are a holder of a subclass 600 Visitor visa. And you apply for a subclass 482 Temporary Skills Shortage visa while onshore.

Check your precise visa status regularly on the Department’s site.

When your bridging visa kicks in

You will not automatically become the holder of a bridging visa as soon as you make that 482 visa application. You will still be on your subclass 600 until it expires. Your bridging visa will usually kick in, if at all, immediately upon the expiry of your subclass 600 Visitor visa.

Bridging visa might never activate

The Department may grant your 482 visa application while your subclass 600 visa is still in effect. This means the bridging visa granted to you in association with your subclass 482 visa application will be extinguished and never come into effect.

Bridging visa not automatically granted

Don’t stress. Be vigilant with your follow-up as to why it could be that your application might not have been a valid one.

Consider making a separate application for a bridging visa if your recent assistance visa application was valid but has not yet yielded a bridging visa grant – this usually wakes up case officers!

Practice tip!

Stay onshore (inside Australia) if your bridging visa is not yet in effect.

Exiting Australia will usually extinguish this visa and you may well find yourself stuck offshore. This can be tricky and I would recommend you get some advice about any planned exit from Australia.

Your experience?

Please share your comments with me.

I’d love to know more about your experience with applying for this visa subclass!

AustralianETA: New App to Streamline Applications for Travellers [Updated April 2022]

Nilesh Nandan · April 6, 2022

Home » Immigration Guides

ETA Mobile App Mobilised!

On 5 April 2022, a legislative instrument was released that amended the Migration Regulations. 

Making an application for an Electronic Travel Authority (ETA) has previously been done using an online application process on the website supported by the Department. 

The Department has now formally introduced the mobile app AustralianETA and is pushing for all applications for ETAs to be made using the app. The AustralianETA app can be downloaded onto a mobile device.

If you are an ETA passport holder, you will now be able to provide biometrics using the app and your device, at the time you make your 601 ETA visa application.

Here is a list of countries that typically are allowed to be granted ETAs:

  • Andorra
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Brunei
  • Canada
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hong Kong (SAR of China)
  • Iceland
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Liechtenstein
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Malta
  • Monaco
  • Norway
  • Portugal
  • Republic of San Marino
  • Singapore
  • South Korea
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Taiwan (excluding official or diplomatic passports)
  • The Netherlands
  • United Kingdom—British Citizen
  • United Kingdom—British National (Overseas)
  • United States of America
  • Vatican City

You can download the app here now!

Ask Me Questions about ETAs!

BOOK IN A CONSULT WITH NILESH NANDAN

Please share your questions and comments with me below. This forum helps others access more answers to more real-life visa questions.

I’d love to know more about your immigration problems and experiences. What would you like to share with me and our visitors?

Name(Required)
Location(Required)
Preferred window for our chat?(Required)
Hidden
Credit Card
American Express
Discover
MasterCard
Visa
Supported Credit Cards: American Express, Discover, MasterCard, Visa
Expiration Date
 

Book Extract: Judge and Jury [Updated May 2022]

Nilesh Nandan · April 5, 2022

Home » Immigration Guides

Excerpt from The Immigration Game – The Book

Judge and Jury

Your application might be handled by more than one decision-maker during the course of its processing. Whilst there maybe a number of handlers of your case, there’s only ever one ultimate decision-maker when the decision is made on your application.

There are a number of decision-makers who decide your application.

Who the decision-maker is and how many decision-makers may be involved in deciding the merits of your case depends on whether you are an applicant who makes a valid application inside Australia, outside Australia or if you arrive as a so-called boat person, usually via Ashmore reef and Christmas Island. (The Department calls these arrive by boat applicants Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals or UMAs) 

If you make a valid application onshore you can usually expect that the first decision-maker will be the Department or more precisely its delegate of the Minister inside the Department. If you receive an unfavourable decision and you have an appeal right, then the second decision-maker will be the Tribunal, or in some cases, two members of the Tribunal. If you make an application outside Australia, and you don’t have any sponsor, you can usually expect to have no appeal rights. This means that the only decision-maker you will encounter is a delegate of the Minister. 

In the case of Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals, then the first decision-maker will be a delegate of the Department and for a cohort of applicants known as “Fast Track Applicants” the second potential decision-maker if you receive an unfavourable decision, would be a member or members of the Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA). The IAA was set up specifically to conduct reviews of fast track reviewable decisions. Fast track reviewable decisions are those decisions to refuse to grant a protection visa to a fast track applicant.”

Finally, I note that in the case of an unfavourable decision on a visa made by the AAT, you will typically have an opportunity for making an application for ministerial intervention although only a very very small percentage of such applications are successful. Notably, there is no compulsion on the Minister to act upon any application made for intervention and you typically can’t appeal a decision by the minister not to intervene. 

So it is only the decision-makers above who can consider the merits of your application. What about the Courts?

The courts will not consider the merits of your application. Merits review by the courts of immigration decisions is generally impermissible. Seriously? Yes! Seriously.

What courts can review is whether or not the decision making itself is infected with any legal error. The Courts can be asked to decide whether or not these other decision-makers have done their job properly. They can be asked to determine whether or not delegates and members have acted within their powers and whether they have made a decision that is wrong in the legal sense. 

I will speak about legal or judicial error more in later chapters but for present purposes know that it is the Minister’s delegate, the Tribunal and in very limited cases, the Minister personally that are your judge and juror. 

Sometimes there is no decision-maker at all, yet you get a visa granted. For example, children born in Australia with neither parent being an Australian citizen will get the visa held by their parents at the time when they are born. Confusing if the parents do not hold the same visa. 

Let’s take a closer look at the Department.

BOOK IN A CONSULT WITH NILESH NANDAN

Ask Me Questions about The Immigration Game!

Please share your questions and comments with me below. This forum helps others access more answers to more real-life visa questions.

I’d love to know more about your immigration problems and experiences. What would you like to share with me and our visitors?

Name(Required)
Location(Required)
Preferred window for our chat?(Required)
Hidden
Credit Card
American Express
Discover
MasterCard
Visa
Supported Credit Cards: American Express, Discover, MasterCard, Visa
Expiration Date
 

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to Next Page »

Hit the ground running with Australia's Best Immigration Lawyers. PRICING

MyVisa® Immigration Lawyers



Liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. MyVisa Lawyers Pty Ltd An Incorporated Legal Practice. © MyVisa Australia Pty Ltd 1999-2021. All Rights Reserved. MyVisa® is a registered trademark. We continually use, value and promote this trade mark. Legal Information. Join the team.

Nilesh Nandan has previously been nominated to work alongside other leading experts to provide strategic advice to the Australian Government's Department of Home Affairs including potential reforms to the legislative framework governing the industry. Views expressed on this web site are his own and do not reflect the views of the Migration Advisory Group.