Our client, a postgraduate student from South Asia, received a notice of intention to cancel their Subclass 500 student visa under section 116 of the Migration Act 1958. The Department of Home Affairs alleged that the client had breached Condition 8202 by failing to maintain satisfactory academic progress over two consecutive semesters. The client had experienced significant personal difficulties during the relevant period, including a family bereavement overseas and a diagnosed medical condition that affected their capacity to study. Despite notifying their education provider, the provider had reported the breach to the Department without adequately considering the client's circumstances. By the time the client contacted our office, the cancellation had already been effected and they were on a Bridging Visa E with limited work rights, causing severe financial hardship.

The case presented several significant challenges. First, the cancellation had already taken effect, meaning we needed to lodge an urgent application with the Administrative Review Tribunal within the strict 21-day timeframe. Second, the Department's decision record indicated that the delegate had considered the client's personal circumstances but found them insufficient to excuse the breach. Third, the education provider's records contained inaccuracies regarding the support they had offered the client, and obtaining corrected documentation proved difficult. Additionally, the client's Bridging Visa E status meant they could not work more than 40 hours per fortnight, creating financial pressure that compounded their stress and affected their ability to focus on preparing their case.

We adopted a multi-pronged approach to this matter: 1. We immediately lodged the ART application within the 21-day deadline and requested an expedited hearing given the client's circumstances. 2. We obtained comprehensive medical evidence from the client's treating practitioners, including a psychiatrist's report documenting the impact of the bereavement and the diagnosed condition on the client's academic performance. 3. We engaged directly with the education provider to obtain corrected records showing that the client had in fact sought academic support, contradicting the provider's initial report to the Department. 4. We prepared detailed submissions addressing each of the delegate's reasons for the cancellation, demonstrating that the delegate had failed to give adequate weight to the client's compelling and compassionate circumstances. 5. We presented evidence of the client's strong academic record prior to the difficult period, their subsequent re-engagement with their studies, and their genuine commitment to completing their degree.

The Administrative Review Tribunal found in our client's favour and set aside the cancellation decision. The Tribunal Member accepted that the client had experienced genuine and significant personal difficulties that directly affected their academic performance, and that the education provider's initial report to the Department was incomplete and potentially misleading. The Tribunal specifically noted that the delegate's decision had given insufficient weight to the medical evidence and the client's personal circumstances, and that a proper consideration of all relevant factors supported the reinstatement of the visa. Our client's student visa was reinstated, and they have since completed their degree with distinction. They are now pursuing a skilled migration pathway to remain in Australia permanently.

KEY FACTS

Overturned

4 months from cancellation to ART decision