This bogus document problem is that a Case Officer from the Department of Immigration believes that you have deliberately tried to mislead them eg. using fake documents or fake paperwork. Immigration is aware that false documents or false paperwork is often provided to them. Visa applicants do this with the intention to secure a more favourable immigration outcome.

Bogus Documents, Types of PIC 4020 Problems

There are two types of bogus documents that result in a Public Interest Criteria 4020 problem.

The first type relates to deception in terms of “identity”, and the second type relates to deception of other facts like skills, health, character and most commonly, work experience.

Bogus Document Definition

A bogus document is a false document.

A bogus document is one that looks as though its been issued by someone when in fact it hasn’t been issued by that person at all or is counterfeit or has been altered in an unauthorised way or has been obtained under false pretences.

PIC 4020 Approaches To Fixing The Problem

Did you in fact mislead Immigration? If it is alleged that you have provided false documents or statements, there are two approaches that should be pursued.

The first approach is to challenge the allegation made by the DIBP and clarify that you in fact provided NO false documents or statements, within the meaning of PIC 4020. There are strict deadlines for this to be done and if this approach is to be taken, you must act quickly.

The second approach is to argue that even if that was the case (i.e. you in fact had provided false documents or materials), the nature and extent of the circumstances are such that PIC 4020 is nevertheless met – The argument is that the fact that false documents or materials were provided should be of little or no consequence in the grander scheme of things. The interests of Australian citizens and permanent residents may also be relevant in some cases.

PIC 4020 Consequences – So What?

Those refused a visa because they are suspected of providing bogus documents or false or misleading information in the three (3) years before they lodge a visa will need to provide reasons as to why the visa they have applied for should be granted.

This is especially the case if the visa they apply for includes PIC 4020 as an essential criterion to be satisfied. Most visas now have this criterion.

Call me to discuss your case privately. I can’t help everybody, but I can give you the support to deal proactively and confidently with the Immigration Department, whatever your circumstances.

CategoryCases, Uncategorized


The information on this site is not legal advice. You should consult a lawyer or registered Australian Migration Agent for advice on your own situation. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Legal practitioners employed by Nandan Vaityte Pty Ltd are members of the scheme. Unless otherwise specified, all advice is provided in accordance with section 276 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by MyVisa Australia Pty Ltd Trading As MyVisa® ABN 65 092 524 359. RMA 1466495 0104983 1790996 © Copyright 2017 Nandan Vaityte Pty Ltd ABN 54 607 960 547 | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap