I wish I had a dollar for every time a client suggested that a decision maker in their case was biased.

Apprehended bias is extremely difficult to establish.

This is so, not just in the AAT Migration and Refugee Division (formerly the Migration Review Tribunal and the Refugee Review Tribunal), but currently in the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption.

Often “apprehended bias” goes untested. This happens because a decision maker will decide to stand down themselves, before someone else makes any formal determination of bias.

“The test to be applied when determining whether a judge is disqualified for apprehended bias is whether a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the resolution of the question he or she is required to decide,” explains Counsel Assisting the Commission, Jeremy Stoljar SC.

In the case of Commissioner Heydon, John Lyons points out in his article in The Australian:

“There are two separate aspects to this story: one political, one legal. Politically, Heydon clearly erred by accepting an invitation to a political function. Yes, he did withdraw, 16 months after agreeing to do it and just as the media was about to publish, but the damage was done and the commission is, for the moment at least, deeply wounded. Legally, it is not so clear that he erred.”

Lyons thinks that Commissioner Heydon will fight.

I’m not so sure. I think he’ll walk – In which case, we’ll never really know whether the Commissioner erred, and whether there was apprehended bias or not.

Decisions are guided by many reasons, not just legal ones. The Commissioner will decide on Tuesday whether he stays or walks.

Read More – See John Lyons’ article at : http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/damned-if-he-stays-damned-if-he-goes-but-dyson-heydon-will-fight/story-e6frgd0x-1227493715920

Write a comment:

*

Your email address will not be published.



The information on this site is not legal advice. You should consult a lawyer or registered Australian Migration Agent for advice on your own situation. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Legal practitioners employed by Nandan Vaityte Pty Ltd are members of the scheme. Unless otherwise specified, all advice is provided in accordance with section 276 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by MyVisa Australia Pty Ltd Trading As MyVisa® ABN 65 092 524 359. RMA 1466495 0104983 1790996 © Copyright 2017 Nandan Vaityte Pty Ltd ABN 54 607 960 547 | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Sitemap